Is the extension really free?
Yes. It runs entirely in your browser, makes no account and sends nothing to us. So is the audit I do myself if you send me your address. Only the implementation work is paid, to an estimate you agree first.
FlowPro checks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini can access, read and reference your site — and fixes what they can't. Start with the free Chrome extension. The audit costs nothing; the fixes are priced to what you need.
A single Disallow written for one bot, or a firewall rule, keeps GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot out. OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity each document this: a blocked search bot means your pages are not in the pool of sources.
An llms.txt or sitemap.xml returns status 200 but serves the home page as HTML. Status codes pass; content fails. Our own site did this before we checked.
Company name, services, prices and FAQ exist only as design, not as visible text or JSON-LD. Systems that fetch a page read the HTML, not the layout.
The opening paragraph says “Small agency. Big-team pace.” and the useful sentence is in section four. Studies of LLM citations find the first third of a page is where most cited text comes from.
Open any page of your site, click the extension. It reads the page and the site's public files (robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt) in your browser and shows a 0–100 score with one of four verdicts: Hard for AI to read, Partly readable by AI, Readable by AI, Ready to be cited.
Every failed check comes with what it is, why it matters and what to change. Blockers first, improvements second. Many fixes take a developer ten minutes.
No developer? Send me the address. I go through your pages myself, tell you which fixes actually matter and what they involve, and send an estimate for the ones you want. See how the work is scoped →
Audit and estimate freeRules come from OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity and Google documentation and from published studies. The weight of each check follows the strength of its evidence.
It measures whether your site is accessible and readable for AI systems, using rules from platform documentation and published studies. It does not measure whether AI assistants mention you: most brand mentions in AI answers come from third-party pages, not from the brand's own site. The score tells you your side of the job is done.
You decide which of these are worth doing. I scope them with you and price the estimate to that, so you are not paying for a package with parts you don't need.
You work directly with the person who reads your site, writes the files and edits the templates. Nothing is passed to a subcontractor, and nothing waits behind an account manager.
I don't promise that ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Gemini will mention or recommend you. Nobody can: the platforms decide, and most brand mentions come from other people's pages. What I promise is narrower and checkable: every fixed page passes the same free check you can run yourself, and the files behind it say the right thing when a crawler asks.
Yes. It runs entirely in your browser, makes no account and sends nothing to us. So is the audit I do myself if you send me your address. Only the implementation work is paid, to an estimate you agree first.
It is the top verdict of the checker: crawlers are allowed, files are valid, facts are in visible HTML and JSON-LD, and every page starts with a direct answer. It means the technical preconditions are met. It is not a promise that any assistant will cite the page.
For Google Search, no — Google states it ignores the file. No AI platform has confirmed reading it, and a 2026 study of 137 000 sites found 97 % of llms.txt files get no requests. Coding agents do read it. The checker treats it as a small, cheap improvement, not a blocker.
Adding JSON-LD did not increase AI citations in the largest controlled study so far (Ahrefs, 1 885 pages, 2026). It still helps search engines disambiguate your business and qualifies pages for rich results. The checker scores it as useful hygiene, weighted below crawler access and content structure.
Send the URL through the form. I look at what the fixes would actually involve on your stack and say so within one business day. If something is impractical there, I tell you that instead of quoting it.
Yes, as a separate offer at flowpro.dev/automatyzacja (Polish).
Install the extension, open your home page, click the icon. If the verdict is anything but Ready to be cited, you'll know exactly what to fix — and who can do it.
Install the free extension